August 25, 2013
“Use soft words and hard arguments.” — English proverb “Soft words are hard arguments.” — Thomas Fuller (emphasis mine) Among the various books I have in progress, lately I’ve been reading Arguing with Friends: Keeping your friends and your convictions by Paul Buller. It’s a relatively thin book, but I only read 2 or 3 […]
Tags: Apologetics, Arguing with Friends, debating issues with friends and co-workers, discussing important issues in person vs on the net, offline debates and discussions, online debates and discussions, Paul Buller, pros and cons, sharing your faith, via internet vs face-to-face conversations, web-based vs in-person debates, witnessing
Posted in Politics, Politics / Science / Religion, Religion, Science, Uncategorized |
August 19, 2013
Part 6: Avoiding Presumptions “A presumption becomes a self-refuting assertion.” — R. Alan Woods Following hot on the heels of “Part 5: Facts Over Feelings”, today’s logical fallacies involve inappropriate presumptions that confuse and invalidate one’s argument. (Of course, I would never do this! … OK, OK, maybe.) Sometimes when making a case or […]
Tags: avoiding presumptions, begging the question, circular reasoning, complex question, critical thinking, good arguments, good logic, how to argue better, how to think better, informal logic, Ken Samples, logical argumentation, logical fallacies, logical thinking, making an argument, petitio principii, poor logic, premises and conclusions, rational thought, reasoning skills, sound reasoning, wishful thinking
Posted in Politics, Politics / Science / Religion, Religion, Science |
August 14, 2013
Part 5: Facts Over Feelings “Feelings should never supersede rational thought… so, if you feel that you’ve got the answer, you should think some more.” — Julie Ann Elliott-Morton Up to this point in the series, we have dealt with the basics. We learned about the fundamental laws of logic, categorical propositions and logical relationships. […]
Tags: appeal to force, appeal to pity, appeal to the people, appeal to the stick, appealing to facts over feelings, appealing to feelings over facts, argumentum ad baculum, argumentum ad misericordium, argumentum ad populum, avoid irrelevant emotional appeals, critical thinking, genetic fallacy, good arguments, good logic, how to argue better, how to think better, informal logic, logical argumentation, logical fallacies, logical thinking, making an argument, poor logic, premises and conclusions, rational thought, reasoning skills, sound reasoning
Posted in Politics, Politics / Science / Religion, Religion, Science |
August 10, 2013
Today’s post is a bit more philosophy-rich than I am usually comfortable with and, thus, than I would normally post. But, as I was reading the book named below (and stretching my brain cells), I realized that the topic and observations are at least as, if not even more, relevant today than when written almost […]
Tags: bullying, coherence over correspondence, conceptual manipulation via education, moral obligation to reduce pain, neopragmatism, PC police, Phil Johnson, political correctness, postmodernist philosophy, problems with neopragmatism, rationality, realism, Reason in the Balance, relativism, Richard Rorty, Rortian liberalism, Rortian thought, Rorty's marginalization of 'them', social justtice, wild orchids
Posted in Politics, Politics / Science / Religion, Religion, Science |
August 4, 2013
Earlier this week (er, I guess it was last week, now), a FB friend shared the following post: “Good morning american FB family, here’s something you should know about. You may be familiar with the Smoothy drinks from a company called NAKED that’s owned by Pepsi. Well, it seems that the contents of these drinks […]
Tags: 100% juice?, alarmism, all-natural or not?, anti-GMO, are all chemical additives bad?, critical thinking, deceptive labeling, false advertising, faulty reasoning, fearmongering, food science, lawsuit against Naked, misleading rhetoric, Naked and PepsiCo in trouble, Naked juices and smoothies, vital poisons, what is "natural"?
Posted in Politics, Politics & Science, Science |